History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Cohen
600 P.2d 892
Or. Ct. App.
1979
Check Treatment

*1 24, 24, May September Argued reconsideration reversed 1979, petition for review аllowed denied November (288 253) January Or 1980 OREGON,

STATE OF Respondent, COHEN, JEFFREY Appellant. 12428)

(No. (78-8869), 18-306 CA P2d 892 *2 Bottini, Marianne Defender, Deputy Salem, Public argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief Babcock, was D. Gary Defender, Public Salem. Cannon, Robert C. General, Assistant Attorney Salem, argued the ‍​‌​​​​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‍cause for respondent. With him on the brief were James A. Redden, General, Attorney Barrie, and Walter L. General, Solicitor Salem. Schwab, Before Chief Judge, Tanzer, and Richard- Roberts, son and Judges.

TANZER, J.

TANZER, J. his conviction appeals Thе defendant him the indictment contends He murder. murder, but was insufficient the ele crime must An indictment 132.550(7) an in of that crime. ments contain: dictment constituting the offense of the acts

"A statement repetition, ordinary language, and concise without common manner as to enable in such intended understanding to know what ‍​‌​​​​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‍charged: This on or the above-named day May, knowingly commit of and robbery, and in the course the said defendant of the said crime which

therance did cause *3 a pistol distinct murder are aggravated Felony murder elements punishments. distinct offenses with that except are the sаme the two crimes personal one additional element: murder commissiоn the homicide. in ORS is found murder felony

The definition 163.115(l)(b): or alone acting either by pеrson, a "It is committed to attempts or who commits persons, more one or first in the degree, burglary in the first arson the in rape degree, the first in kidnapping degrеe, the sodomy in any degree ‍​‌​​​​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‍in or robbery degree, first and in furtherance in the course of degree and first commit, to attempting or he is therefrom, he, or аnother flight immediate the or aof the death any, if there be causes participant participants.” the than one of other

Aggravated murder is defined ORS 163.095(2)(d):

"The defendant committed the homicide course or of the furtherance robbery any degree, crime kidnapping or arson degree, any in the first specified sexual offense chapter or in immediate flight therefrom.” for to felony It is sufficient the commis defendant was allege engaged a homicide specified sion of one of felonies and that actually resulted. The indictment need not who in the killing fеlony did the because participant be with murder. may contrast, In there is no viсarious liability ag gravated murder. Only the person actually who com mitted the homicide in the furtherance or in flight from the felony has committed aggravated murdеr. An for aggravated murder, therefore, must allege that defendant personally committed the homicide. This indictment fails to do It is so. insuffi cient put defendant on notice he must answer a charge of aggravated Although suf ficient murder, felony not allege does aggravated murder. felony

Because murder was and the еle alleged beyond crime ments of that were found necessarily ocсurred, doubt to have not reverse reasonable we do Rather, entirety. judgmеnt ‍​‌​​​​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‍judgment remanded the convic reversed and for modification of and for tiоn murder to from new sentence Rainw entry accordingly. of a State (1976). ater, App 553 P2d 1085 26 Or *4 and remanded. Reversed SCHWAB, J.,C. dissenting. as follows: pertinent part

The indictment reads

[300] ) Oregon, Plaintiff of "State ) INDICTMENT

) - ) I 163.095 Count - ) Cohen, II Jеffrey ‍​‌​​​​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‍Count ORS 163.115 Defendant(s) ) ) [*] * * * * defendant(s) by "The above-named is/are1 accused Jury Wаshington County by the Grand this indict- crime(s) I, ment of Count * * * in Count II on or about above-named dаy May Washington County, the 2nd Oregon, unlawfully knowingly did robbery, and in the course of and therance of the defendant said crime which the said did cause the V. being, human to-wit: Donаld Baune, firearm, to-wit: a pistol, II

Count an as alternative means of I, alleged in Count defendant on or above-named day May, intentionally cause the dеath of another by shooting him with a a pistol wit: « ” * * * * * I

I if we of Count agree only body loоk to the indictment, dis- ambiguity suffers from the However, indict- cussed in the majority opinion. еntirety ment favor ambiguity resolves defendant a clear and unequivocal shot the decedent death violation murder). (aggravated ORS 163.095 I affirm. would plural the indictment. forms of the were not deleted on words

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Cohen
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Sep 24, 1979
Citation: 600 P.2d 892
Docket Number: 18-306 (78-8869), CA 12428
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.