State v. Codington

Jun 26, 1911
Versions:85 A. 1135
82 N.J.L. 728
53 Vroom 728
1911 N.J. LEXIS 261
Pee Cukiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Chief Justice in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellob, Gaeeison, Swayze, Bebgen, Vookhees, Kalisch, Bogeet, Ykedenbuegh, •Congdon, Sullivan, White, JJ. 11.

For reversal—None.