State v. Codington

Jun 26, 1911
Reporters:
, , ,
Before:
Cukiam
Pee Cukiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Chief Justice in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellob, Gaeeison, Swayze, Bebgen, Vookhees, Kalisch, Bogeet, Ykedenbuegh, •Congdon, Sullivan, White, JJ. 11.

For reversal—None.