History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Clemens
2021 ND 176
| N.D. | 2021
|
Check Treatment

*1 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OCTOBER 14, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA I N T H E S U P R E M E C O U R T STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2021 ND 176 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v. Brenda Lee Clemens, Defendant and Appellant No. 20210136 Appeal from the District Court of Sargent County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Mark T. Blumer, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Jayne Pfau, State’s Attorney, Forman, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.

Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, Mandan, ND, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Clemens No. 20210136 Per Curiam.

[¶1] Brenda Lee Clemens appeals from an amended criminal judgment entered after she pled guilty to theft. Clemens argues the district court erred in awarding the restitution amount. We conclude the district court acted within statutory limits. State v. Harstad , 2020 ND 151, ¶ 7, 945 N.W.2d 265 (“When reviewing a restitution order, we look to whether the district court acted within the limits set by statute, which is a standard similar to our abuse of discretion standard.”). We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte

1

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Clemens
Court Name: North Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 14, 2021
Citation: 2021 ND 176
Docket Number: 20210136
Court Abbreviation: N.D.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.