State v. Clark
252 A.2d 720
N.J.
1969
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate *26 Division. 105 N. J. Super. 381 (1968). In the event the defendant wishes to attack his administrative transfer to the State Prison Farm, Rahway, as an abuse of discretion, he may do so by an affirmative showing in an independent proceeding under B. B. 4:88-8. See State v. Miles, 87 N. J. Super. 571, 585-586 (Law Div. 1965), affirmed, 94 N. J. Super. 169 (App. Div. 1967).

For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintbaub and Justices Jacobs, Feancis, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettino and Hane-MAET - 7.

For reversal — None.