midpage

State v. ClarkState v. Clark

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 5, 1969
Versions:252 A.2d 720
54 N.J. 25
1969 N.J. LEXIS 166
Per Curiam.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate *26 Division. 105 N. J. Super. 381 (1968). In the event the defendant wishes to attack his administrative transfer to the State Prison Farm, Rahway, as an abuse of discretion, he may do so by an affirmative showing in an independent proceeding under B. B. 4:88-8. See State v. Miles, 87 N. J. Super. 571, 585-586 (Law Div. 1965), affirmed, 94 N. J. Super. 169 (App. Div. 1967).

For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintbaub and Justices Jacobs, Feancis, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettino and Hane-MAET - 7.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Clark
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: May 5, 1969
Citations: 252 A.2d 720; 54 N.J. 25; 1969 N.J. LEXIS 166
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
Log In