History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. City of Newark
90 N.J. Super. 68
| N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. | 1966
|
Check Treatment
90 N.J. Super. 68 (1966)
216 A.2d 246

STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 11, 1966.
Decided January 18, 1966.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FOLEY and COLLESTER.

Mr. Joseph A. Hoffman, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney).

Mr. William H. Walls argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Norman N. Schiff, Corporation Counsel, attorney; Mr. Joseph A. Ward, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Crane in the Law Division, reported at 87 N.J. Super. 38 (Law Div. 1965).

Case Details

Case Name: State v. City of Newark
Court Name: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Date Published: Jan 18, 1966
Citation: 90 N.J. Super. 68
Court Abbreviation: N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.