State v. Chiaccio
134 A. 919
N.J.
1926
Check Treatment
*205 Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Kalish, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.