History
  • No items yet
midpage
304 Conn. 906
Conn.
2012
40 A.3d 784 (2012)
304 Conn. 906

STATE of Connecticut
v.
CHARLOTTE HUNGERFORD HOSPITAL.

SC 18947

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided April 4, 2012.

Stephen V. Manning and Donna R. Zito, in support of the petition.

Jane R. Rosenberg and Lynn D. Wittenbrink, assistant attorneys general, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 133 Conn.App. 479, 36 A.3d 252, is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the subpoena power conferred upon the claims commissioner by General Statutes § 4-151(c) permits him to subpoena documents from a respondent that has not been named as a party to the suit that the claims commissioner has been asked to authorize?"

Case Details

Case Name: State v. CHARLOTTE HUNGERFORD HOSPITAL
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Apr 4, 2012
Citations: 304 Conn. 906; 40 A.3d 784; 2012 Conn. LEXIS 149; 2012 WL 1435481; SC 18947
Docket Number: SC 18947
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In