History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Centafanti
898 N.E.2d 45
Ohio
2008
Check Treatment

{¶ 1} The trial court order and the opinion of the court of appeals in this case were premised upon the application of R.C. 2941.401. Because appellee was incarcerated in a federal prison in Ohio rather than in a “correctional institution of this state,” see R.C. 2941.401 and 2967.01, R.C. 2941.401 does not apply.

{¶ 2} Accordingly, this case is remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings to determine the statute that properly applies and whether the requirements of that statute were satisfied.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lan-zinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Centafanti
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 2, 2008
Citation: 898 N.E.2d 45
Docket Number: No. 2007-1744
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.