State v. Carrigan

Jun 14, 1920
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Pee
Pee Curiam.

The judgment under ‍​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​​‌​‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‍review herein should be affirmed, for the ‍​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​​‌​‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‍reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief ‍​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​​‌​‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‍Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—Swayze, Trenci-iard, ‍​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​​‌​‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‍Bergen, IIeppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 7.

For reversal—Parker, ‍​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​​‌​‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‍Kalisch, White, Taylor, JJ. 4.