State v. Carrigan
94 N.J.L. 566
N.J.
1920
Check Treatment
Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—Swayze, Trenci-iard, Bergen, IIeppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 7.

For reversal—Parker, Kalisch, White, Taylor, JJ. 4.