midpage

State v. CammarataState v. Cammarata

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 10, 1935
Versions:176 A. 323
114 N.J.L. 274
1935 N.J. LEXIS 227
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Yan Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Cammarata
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jan 10, 1935
Citations: 176 A. 323; 114 N.J.L. 274; 1935 N.J. LEXIS 227
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
Log In