State v. CammarataState v. Cammarata
Jan 10, 1935
Versions:176 A. 323114 N.J.L. 2741935 N.J. LEXIS 227
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Yan Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.