State v. Cammarata

Jan 10, 1935
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Per Curiam.
Per Curiam.

The judgment under ‍​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌‍review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons ‍​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌‍expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme ‍​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌‍Court.

For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, ‍​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌‍Donges, Perskie, Yan Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, ‍​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌‍JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.