History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Calloway
181 So. 2d 397
La.
1966
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

The application is denied. On the showing made we are not justified in exercising our supervisory jurisdiction; however, the State is reserved the right to submit further evidence as a predicate for the admissibility of the confession; as well as rebut any evidence offered by the defendant, and to show all the facts surrounding the giving of the confession. In the event of an adverse ruling as to the admissibility of the confession the State is reserved the right to renew its application.

HAMITER, J., is of the opinion that the relief prayed for by the State should be granted.





Concurrence Opinion

McCALEB, J.,

concurs in the rulings, ex-

cept in the reservation to the State to renew its application to this Court in the event the trial judge excludes the confession.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion that the writ should be granted.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Calloway
Court Name: Supreme Court of Louisiana
Date Published: Jan 14, 1966
Citation: 181 So. 2d 397
Docket Number: No. 48025
Court Abbreviation: La.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.