History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Callary
110 N.J.L. 24
N.J.
1933
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court, and reported in 108 N.J.L. 462.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, BROGAN, KAYS, HETFIELD, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Callary
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jan 23, 1933
Citation: 110 N.J.L. 24
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.