midpage

State v. CageState v. Cage

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Mar 9, 1984
84-K-0173
Versions:446 So. 2d 1214

Denied.

DIXON, C.J., would grant because the “enhancement” contingency (14:95.2) was not charged in a count in the bill. The treatment of this issue in State v. Roussell, 424/226, should probably be overruled.

Reconsideration Denied, 449 So.2d 1024.

CALOGERO, J., would grant the writ.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Cage
Court Name: Supreme Court of Louisiana
Date Published: Mar 9, 1984
Citations: 446 So. 2d 1214; 84-K-0173
Docket Number: 84-K-0173
Court Abbreviation: La.
Log In