State v. Cage

Mar 9, 1984
84-K-0173
Reporters:
Before:
Dixon, Calogero

Denied.

DIXON, C.J., would grant because the “enhancement” contingency (14:95.2) was not charged in a count in the bill. The treatment of this issue in State v. Roussell, 424/226, should probably be overruled.

Reconsideration Denied, 449 So.2d 1024.

CALOGERO, J., would grant the writ.