State v. ByrdState v. Byrd
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Mallaed
“Thе Superior Court has no jurisdiction to try an accusеd for a specific misdemeanor on the warrant of an inferior court unless he is first tried and convicted for such misdemeanor in the inferior court and appeals to the Supеrior Court from sentence pronounced against him by the inferior court on his conviction for such misdemeanor.” State v. Hall, 240 N.C. 109, 81 S.E. 2d 189. See also State v. Thomas, 236 N.C. 454, 73 S.E. 2d 283, and State v. Banks, 241 N.C. 572, 86 S.E. 2d 76.
The question of jurisdiction is not raised or discussed by the defendant оr by the Attorney General in the briefs. The Court of Appеals will take notice ex mero motu of the failure of the record to show jurisdiction in the сourt entering the judgment appealed from. State v. Johnson, 251 N.C. 339, 111 S.E. 2d 297. In this cаse it was the duty of the defendant appellant tо see that the record on appeal was properly made up and transmitted to the Court оf Appeals. State v. Stubbs, 265 N.C. 420, 144 S.E. 2d 262.
The record on appeal itself calls attention to the fact that *674 there is а failure to show that the defendant was tried in, sentenced by, and appealed from the Municipal-County Court.
We have carefully examined the exceptions ■ and assignments of еrror presented on this record and are of thе opinion that they prеsent no prejudicial error in the trial in the Superiоr Court. If they did disclose error, because of an incomplete record, they are not proрerly before this court. State v. Hunter, 245 N.C. 607, 96 S.E. 2d 840.
Fоr the reasons herein stated and for the failure of the record to show jurisdiction, the appeal must be dismissed. State v. Banks, supra.
Appeal dismissed.
Bkitt and PaeiceR, JJ., concur.