History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Burns
107 Or. App. 380
Or. Ct. App.
1991
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM

After a trial to the court on stipulated facts, defendants were convicted of manufacture and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(1), (4). They claim that the court erred in denying their motions to suppress and motions to controvert.

The facts of this case are set out in State v. Morrison/Bartee, 107 Or App 343, 812 P2d 832 (1991), and the law and the result are the same.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Burns
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: May 22, 1991
Citation: 107 Or. App. 380
Docket Number: 88-07-1542-C3; CA A62161; 88-07-1542-C2; CA A62298
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.