History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Burlew
768 P.2d 447
Or. Ct. App.
1989
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals her convictions for conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(1); ORS 161.450(1), delivery of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(1), and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4). The state concedes that the trial court erred in entering separate convictions and sentences. We accept the concession. ORS 161.485(3); State v. McNamer, 80 Or App 418, 421, 722 P2d 51 (1986).

The state argues, nonetheless, that we should not reach the merger question, because defendant failed to raise it below. Alleged errors will not be addressed on appeal unless preserved in the lower court, except errors of law apparent on the face of the record. ORAP 7.19(5). As in State v. McNamer, supra, the egregious error is apparent on the face of the record.

Remanded with instructions to vacate the convictions for conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance and possession of a controlled substance and to resentence on the conviction for delivery of a controlled substance.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Burlew
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Feb 22, 1989
Citation: 768 P.2d 447
Docket Number: 87-853A-C-2; CA A47433
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.