History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Brown
94 Or. App. 567
Or. Ct. App.
1989
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants and driving with a suspended driver’s license, contending that the trial court erred in denying his pretrial motion to suppress evidence. The trial court denied the motion without making findings of fact or an explanation, and we cannot review the claim of error. See State v. Wise, 305 Or 78, 81, 749 P2d 1179 (1988). Consequently, we vacate the judgment and remand for fact findings on the motion to suppress. State v. Wise, supra; see also State v. Raygoza, 90 Or App 473, 475-76, 752 P2d 1253 (1988).

Judgment vacated; remanded for findings of fact and entry of an order or judgment consistent therewith.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Brown
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Jan 4, 1989
Citation: 94 Or. App. 567
Docket Number: 96556, 96557A; CA A47238, A47239
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.