History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Brown
74 Ohio St. 3d 523
Ohio
1996
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed. In this court, appellant makes no attempt to establish good cause, but instead argues the questions he wanted the court of appeals to hear, but which it did not hear. The application was rejected for failure to state a good cause for late filing. That is the issue before this court. Since appellant does not even address the issue, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Brown
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 14, 1996
Citation: 74 Ohio St. 3d 523
Docket Number: No. 95-2122
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.