State v. BrownState v. Brown
STATE of Louisiana
v.
John Edward BROWN.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Charles B. Bice, Dist. Atty., Kermit M. Simmons, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.
Herman A. Castete, Sanders & Castete, Ltd., P. C., Winnfield, for defendant-appellant.
PER CURIAM.
Defendant John Edward Brown was charged by bill of information with aggravated burglary, a violation of
The issue of whether defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel is more properly raised by application for a writ of habeas corpus in the district court, where a full evidentiary hearing may be conducted if warranted. See, State v. Malveaux,
Finding no reversible error on the record before us, we affirm defendant's conviction and sentence.
NOTES
Notes
[1] The defense claim that the trial court should have intervened to protect defendant's interests is actually an adjunct of the ineffectiveness argument, because it relates to the proper remedy of trial counsel's alleged shortcomings.