History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Broussard
263 La. 342
La.
1972
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

' The defendant was convicted for violation of La.R.S. 26:88 (allowing “B” drinking) and appeals.

Inasmuch as no bills of exceptions were .perfected, we are limited on appeal to a review of errors discoverable on the face of the pleadings and proceedings. La.C.Cr.P. art. 920. We find none. .

Although in brief in this Court .the accused urges the statute under which, he is charged is unconstitutional, this issue was not properly raised in the trial; court and is not before us on appeal. Cf. La.C.Cr.P. arts. 532, 859; State v. Leming, 217 La. 257, 46 So.2d 262 (1950); State v. Kavanaugh, 203 La. 1, 13 So.2d 366 (1943).

The conviction and sentence are. affirmed. ...






Dissenting Opinion

BARHAM, J.,

dissents. See reasons assigned in State v. Broussard, 263 La. 340, 268 So.2d 247.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Broussard
Court Name: Supreme Court of Louisiana
Date Published: Oct 26, 1972
Citation: 263 La. 342
Docket Number: No. 52634
Court Abbreviation: La.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.