History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Brooks
269 So. 2d 23
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1972
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The following question has been certified from the Brevard County Court of Record pursuant to Fla.App.R. 4.6, 32 F.S.A. The question is:

Does the trial and acquittal on the charge of receiving stolen property under Section 811.16, F.S. [F.S.A.], bar a subsequent trial for possession of the same property under Section 814.03(2)?

It is our view that there appears to be controlling precedent in this state on which the decision of the trial judge could be based. The trial court, under § 9, article V, of the Florida Constitution, F.S.A., (1968 revision) has the power to adjudicate the question, the answer to which may be reviewed on appeal if desired. In the exercise of its discretion this court, therefore, respectfully declines to answer the question as certified.1

CROSS, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.

. Spaulding v. Florida Gas Co., 249 So.2d 696 (Fla.App.1971); Pridgeon v. Folsom, 174 So.2d 619 (Fla.App.1965).

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Brooks
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Nov 20, 1972
Citation: 269 So. 2d 23
Docket Number: No. 72-197
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.