History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Braswell
243 Conn. 248
Conn.
1997
Check Treatment

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case *249should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.1

The appeal is dismissed.

We granted the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court; State v. Braswell, 42 Conn. App. 264, 679 A.2d 973 (1996); limited to the following issue: “Whether the Appellate Court properly held that the defendant’s conviction and consecutive sentence for attempted sale of narcotics in violation of General Statutes §§ 21a-278 (b) and 53a-49 (a) and attempted delivery of narcotics to an inmate of a correctional institution in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-174 (a) and 53a-49 (a) did not violate principles of double jeopardy?” State v. Braswell, 239 Conn. 917, 682 A.2d 1006 (1996).

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Braswell
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Nov 11, 1997
Citation: 243 Conn. 248
Docket Number: SC 15532
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.