State v. BosakState v. Bosak
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Per Curiam
The defendant herein pleaded guilty to a charge of possession of lysergic acid diethylamide in violation of
Insofar as any other errors, except the sentence, are concerned, no motion for new trial was filed in this case; therefore, the only issue before us is whether the sentence was excessive. State v. Price, 202 Neb. 308, 275 N.W.2d 82 (1979). The presentence report indicates that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when imposing imprisonment in lieu of probation. We have frequently held that, absent an abuse of discretion by the trial court in sentencing within statutory limits, this court will not disturb the action of the trial court on appeal. State v. Hortman, ante p. 393, 299 N.W.2d 187 (1980); State v. Tweedy, 197 Neb. 851, 251 N.W.2d 380 (1977). In view of the fact that the sentence was more than one-third of the maximum term, however, it must be reduced. The sentence is modified to provide that the defendant shall be confined to the Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex for a term of not less than 1 year 8 months and not more than 5 years.
Affirmed as modified.