History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Bolitho
140 A. 921
N.J.
1927
Check Treatment
Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kalisch in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chanoelloe, Teenchaep, Black, Katzenbach, White, Yan Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Bolitho
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Sep 8, 1927
Citation: 140 A. 921
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.