State v. Bolitho

Sep 8, 1927
Reporters:
, , ,
Before:
Per Curiam.
Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kalisch in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chanoelloe, Teenchaep, Black, Katzenbach, White, Yan Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.