History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Bolitho
104 N.J.L. 446
| N.J. | 1927
|
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kalisch in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, BLACK, KATZENBACH, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Bolitho
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Sep 8, 1927
Citation: 104 N.J.L. 446
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.