midpage

State v. BoisvertState v. Boisvert

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Apr 22, 1996
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Berdon

Dissenting Opinion

BERDON, J.,

dissenting. I would grant certification on the following issues:

“1. Did ‍​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‍the stop of the defendant by the police at a roadside sobriety check or roadblock while operating *904his motor vehicle violate his rights under ‍​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‍article first, §§ 7 and 9, of the Connecticut constitution?
Robert J. McKay and Gregory A. Thompson, in support of the petition. Jack W. Fischer, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided ‍​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‍April 22, 1996
“2. In the alternative, if a police roadblock sobriety checkpoint is determined to be a valid procedure in Connecticut, were the defendant’s ‍​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‍federal and state constitutional rights violated by the failure of the police to follow specific guidelines and/or procedures?”





Lead Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification ‍​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‍for appeal from the Appellate Court, 40 Conn. App. 420 (AC 14338), is denied.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Boisvert
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Apr 22, 1996
Citations: 237 Conn. 903; 674 A.2d 1332; 1996 Conn. LEXIS 162
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
Log In