midpage

State v. BletschState v. Bletsch

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jan 20, 2005
SC 17340
Reporters:
, ,

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn. App. 186 (AC 24260), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for exemption from the sex offender registry?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant’s convictions for sexual assault in the second degree and risk of injury to a child did not constitute double jeopardy?”
*919 Decided January 20, 2005 Eileen F. McCarthy, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Bletsch
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Jan 20, 2005
Citations: 272 Conn. 918; 866 A.2d 1288; 2005 Conn. LEXIS 33; SC 17340
Docket Number: SC 17340
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
Log In