State v. Bleefield

Oct 9, 1935
Versions:181 A. 168
115 N.J.L. 559
1935 N.J. LEXIS 349
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.