midpage

State v. . BlairState v. . Blair

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 11, 1946
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Per Curiam.
Per Curiam.

The embezzlement statute creates an offense unknown at common ‍​‌‌​​​‌​​​​‌​​​​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‍law. It applies only to the classes of persons therein naméd. *71 S. v. Whitehurst, 212 N. C., 300, 193 S. E., 657; S. v. ‍​‌‌​​​‌​​​​‌​​​​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‍Eurell, 220 N. C., 519, 17 S. E. (2d), 669. It does not embrace a vendor in an executory contract of purchase ‍​‌‌​​​‌​​​​‌​​​​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‍and sale. Hence the court below erred in denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss as in case of nonsuit.

The defendant ‍​‌‌​​​‌​​​​‌​​​​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‍did not appeal from the judgment pronounced in the ease (4430) consolidated and tried with this indictment.’ Hence, said judgment ‍​‌‌​​​‌​​​​‌​​​​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‍is not affected by this opinion.

The judgment below (4477) is

Eeversed.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. . Blair
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Dec 11, 1946
Citations: 227 N.C. 70; 40 S.E.2d 460; 1946 N.C. LEXIS 346
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
Log In