History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Bispham
244 Conn. 929
Conn.
1998
Check Treatment

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 135 (AC 15820), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting a written statement of the complainant as constancy of accusation evidence, and that the defendant did not show prejudice from the admission of such evidence, despite the prosecutor’s closing argument that the written statement would be available for review in the jury room to support the complainant’s credibility?”

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Bispham
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Apr 28, 1998
Citation: 244 Conn. 929
Docket Number: SC 15925
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.