State v. BilderState v. Bilder
On April 8, 1987, Rudolph Bilder was seated in a Summit County courtroom observing a trial. A female person sitting one row in front of him looked back and saw that his genitalia were exposed through a hole in his trousers. Bilder was arrested and charged with public indecency,
Assignment of Error 1
“The guilty verdict against the appellant was contrary to law where the circumstantial evidence upon which the verdict was based was not irrecon-silable [sic] with a reasonable theory of innocence.”
Bilder contends he was convicted on circumstantial evidence. The record shows that the direct testimony of an eyewitness was presented. The record further shows that there is substantial evidence which goes to all the elements of the crime sufficient to convince a jury of Bilder’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
State
v.
Eley
(1978),
This assignment of error is not well-taken and is overruled.
Assignment of Error 2
“The trial court exceeded its sentencing authority when it imposed upon appellant a sentence for which there is no statutory basis.”
Judgment accordingly.