112 Iowa 433 | Iowa | 1900
II. Complaint is made of the sixth paragraph of tho court’s charge, but, taken as a whole, we think it not prejudicial, though perhaps somewhat inconsistent.
As this case must be reversed for the errors pointed out, we leave the question of the sufficiency of the corroborating evidence with the statement that we find some in the record which the jury might properly consider. Other questions discussed are not likely to arise on a retrial. Reversed and remanded for a new trial. — Reversed.