History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Bies
79 Ohio St. 3d 192
Ohio
1997
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying appellant’s application for reopening for the same reasons articulated by the court of appeals. Appellant has offered no compelling justification why his application was filed beyond the time strictures of App. R. 26(B).

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Bies
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 16, 1997
Citation: 79 Ohio St. 3d 192
Docket Number: No. 97-12
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.