History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Bicanich
66 N.J. 557
| N.J. | 1975
|
Check Treatment
66 N.J. 557 (1975)
334 A.2d 17

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
JOHN BICANICH, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued February 18, 1975.
Decided February 26, 1975.

Mr. Julian Wilsey, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

*558 Mr. Daniel J. Carluccio argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Citta, Gasser, Carluccio and Holzapfel, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division, 132 N.J. Super. 393.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES, Justices JACOBS, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD and Judge CONFORD — 7.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Bicanich
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Feb 26, 1975
Citation: 66 N.J. 557
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.