No. 44083 | La. | Nov 10, 1958

TATE, Justice.

Defendant appeals from a conviction of theft. LSA-R.S. 14:67.

Since the defendant perfected no bills of exception, and there being no error patent on the face of the record, there is nothing before us for review. State v. Richard, 230 La. 853" date_filed="1956-06-29" court="La." case_name="State v. Richard">230 La. 853, 89 So.2d 367; State v. Perez, 228 La. 796" date_filed="1955-11-07" court="La." case_name="State v. Perez">228 La. 796, 84 So.2d 195; State v. Scott, 227 La. 198" date_filed="1955-02-14" court="La." case_name="State v. Scott">227 La. 198, 78 So.2d 832; State v. Dartez, 222 La. 9" date_filed="1952-11-10" court="La." case_name="State v. Dartez">222 La. 9, 62 So.2d 83; State v. McDonald, 218 La. 198, 48 So.2d 797.

The conviction and sentence are affirmed.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.