State v. BennettState v. Bennett
Sep 15, 1927
Versions:138 A. 923104 N.J.L. 1861927 N.J. LEXIS 326
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered hy the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Parker, Kaliscíh, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.