midpage

State v. BennettState v. Bennett

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Sep 15, 1927
Versions:138 A. 923
104 N.J.L. 186
1927 N.J. LEXIS 326
Per .Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered hy the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Parker, Kaliscíh, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Bennett
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Sep 15, 1927
Citations: 138 A. 923; 104 N.J.L. 186; 1927 N.J. LEXIS 326
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
Log In