State v. BeaudoinState v. Beaudoin
- Reporters:
- ,
- Before:
- Edward A. Dufresne Jr., James L. Cannella, Clarence E. McManus
On November 24, 2004, the Appellants filed a Motion to Set Aside the Judgment for Bond Forfeiture and Nullity of Judgment. According to a minute entry, a hearing was held on that date and the motion was denied by the trial judge in open court. The bench ruling was not reduced to a written judgment signed by the trial judge. Instead, the word “Denied” was written across the motion, initialed by an unknown person, obviously not the trial judge. That does not constitute a final judgment.
We issued an order to show cause to the Appellant as to why the appeal should not be dismissed for prematurity. The Appellant agreed that the appeal was premature. Consequently, the appeal must be dismissed. Pursuant to law, the Appellants may refile their appeal from the written judgment when it is obtained from the trial court. See:
Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Costs of this appeal are to be paid by the Appellants.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Notes
Except as otherwise provided by law, every final judgment shall be signed by the judge. For the purpose of an appeal as provided in Article 2083, no appeal may be taken from a final judgment until the requirement of this Article has been fulfilled. No appeal may be taken from a partial final judgment under Article 1915(B) until the judgment has been designated a final judgment under Article 1915(B). An appeal may be taken from a final judgment under Article 1915(A) without the judgment being so designated.