State v. BartsState v. Barts
Jan 4, 1945
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Per Curiam.
Pee Cueiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Paekee, Case, Bodine, Poetee, Wells, Raffeety, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 10.
For reversal — Colie, J. 1.