State v. BarhamState v. Barham
May 2, 1956
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Consideration
Per Curiam.
The defendant seriously contends that the State’s evidence is insufficient to support the verdict. A careful consideration of the evidence, however, leads us to the conclusion that it is sufficient, and we so hold. Consequently, the assignments of error, in our opinion, present no prejudicial error that would justify disturbing the verdict rendered below.
No error.
Johnson, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.