State v. Ballard

349 N.C. 286 | N.C. | 1998

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion for the Court of Appeals by Martin (John C.), J., the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. We conclude that defendant’s petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.

REVERSED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.

Justice Wynn did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.