History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Ballard
349 N.C. 286
N.C.
1998
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion for the Court of Appeals by Martin (John C.), J., the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. We conclude that defendant’s petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.

REVERSED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.

Justice Wynn did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Ballard
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Nov 6, 1998
Citation: 349 N.C. 286
Docket Number: No. 488A97
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.