History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Baker
2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1964
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2005
|
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Barry K. Baker (Defendant) appeals from a judgment of conviction of murder in the first degree. Defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction in that the evidence did not *506show deliberation. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the evidence was sufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that Defendant deliberated before shooting the victim. State v. Shinn, 921 S.W.2d 70, 72-73 (Mo.App. E.D.1996). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Baker
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 27, 2005
Citation: 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1964
Docket Number: No. ED 85000
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.