State v. Baker
648 A.2d 1127
N.J.
1994
Check Treatment

*1 89 1127 648 A.2d PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, JERSEY, STATE OF NEW BAKER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. v. JAMES 27, 27, Argued September October 1994. 1994 Decided Defender, Sloan, argued the Deputy Public L. Assistant Robert (Susan Reisner, Defender, Acting L. Public appellant cause for attorney). Prosecutor, Suarez, for argued the cause A. Assistant

Robert (.Andrew Ruotolo, Jr., Prosecutor, County respondent K Union Kafiowitz, Assistant Prosecu- attorney; and Steven J. Mr. Suarez brief). tor, and on the letter of counsel General, argued the cause on Flanagan, Deputy Attorney Janet (Debo- curiae, Jersey Attorney General of New of amicus behalf General, Poritz, attorney). Attorney T. rah PER CURIAM. affirmed, substantially reasons ex for the judgment is

The Appellate majority opinion for the pressed Judge in Skillman’s (1994). 55, A Division, N.J.Super. 636 .2d 553 reported at 270 O’HERN, J., dissenting. reverse, expressed in substantially for the reasons

I would 79, N.J.Super. dissenting opinion, reported at 270 Judge Kestin’s (1994). 636 A .2d 553 WILENTZ, and Justices affirmance —Chief Justice

For POLLOCK, HANDLER, and CLIFFORD, GARIBALDI STEIN —6. O’HERN —1.

For reversal —Justice