State v. Baker, 648 A.2d 1127

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Skillman’s majority opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 270 N.J.Super. 55, 636 A.2d 553 (1994).

---

Dissenting Opinion

O’HERN, J.,

dissenting.

I would reverse, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Kestin’s dissenting opinion, reported at 270 N.J.Super. 79, 636 A.2d 553 (1994).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 6.

For reversal — Justice O’HERN — 1.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Baker

Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date Published: Oct 27, 1994

Citations: 648 A.2d 1127; 138 N.J. 89; 1994 N.J. LEXIS 861

Court Abbreviation: N.J.