History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Austin
72 Vt. 46
Vt.
1899
Check Treatment
Pee Cueiam.

The question is whether the allegation that the prisoner had carnal knowledge with Cora Smith, etc., charges adultery. The case is so needlessly here that we do not consider the question on its merits, but reverse pro forma, sustain the demurrer, and remand, that the State’s Attorney may ask leave to amend the information, which he ought to have done at once on the objection being made. It is not well that the course of justice should be obstructed by impediments that can be so easily removed.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Austin
Court Name: Supreme Court of Vermont
Date Published: Nov 20, 1899
Citation: 72 Vt. 46
Court Abbreviation: Vt.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.