STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, V. TAREIK Q. ARTIS, APPELLANT.
No. S-16-464
Nebraska Supreme Court
Filed May 5, 2017
Motion for rehearing overruled May 5, 2017
296 Neb. 606
Heavican, C.J., Wright, Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, Kelch, and Funke, JJ.
SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION
Appeal from the District Court for Lancaster County: LORI A. MARET, Judge. Supplemental opinion: Former opinion modified. Motion for rehearing overruled.
Robert Wm. Chapin, Jr., for appellant.
Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, Sarah E. Marfisi, and Nathan A. Liss for appellee.
HEAVICAN, C.J., WRIGHT, MILLER-LERMAN, CASSEL, STACY, KELCH, and FUNKE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Case No. S-16-464 is before this court on the appellee‘s motion for rehearing concerning our opinion in State v. Artis.1 We overrule the motion, but we modify the original opinion as follows: In the section entitled “V. ANALYSIS,” under subheading “2. Plain Error,” subsection “(a) Artis’ Sentence Is Indeterminate,” we withdraw the third and fourth sentences of the single paragraph of that subsection, which now reads:
(a) Artis’ Sentence Is Indeterminate
[9-12] The State has mischaracterized Artis’ sentence of “not less than 2 years, nor more than 2 years” as a determinate sentence. A determinate sentence is imposed when the defendant is sentenced to a single term of years, such as a sentence of 2 years’ imprisonment. See State v. White, 256 Neb. 536, 590 N.W.2d 863 (1999). In contrast, when imposing an indeterminate sentence, a sentencing court ordinarily articulates either a minimum term and maximum term or a range of time for which a defendant is to be incarcerated.
The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.
FORMER OPINION MODIFIED.
MOTION FOR REHEARING OVERRULED.
