State v. Arabie, 502 So. 2d 565

Denied.

LEMMON, J., concurs with reasons.

DIXON, C.J., and CALOGERO, J., would grant the writ.

LEMMON, Justice, concurring in the Denial of the Application.

The double jeopardy problem encountered in Hudson v. Louisiana, 450 U.S. 40, 101 S.Ct. 970, 67 L.Ed.2d 30 (1981), is not present here. The trial judge reviewed the jury verdict (on a post-verdict motion for acquittal) as a question of law and rendered a judgment of conviction on the lesser included responsive offense of manslaughter. La.C.Cr.P. art. 821 C. The court of appeal further reviewed the trial court‘s action as a question of law and properly reinstated the verdict of guilty of second degree murder. This action by the court of appeal was not a retrial of the defendant and did not constitute a double jeopardy violation.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Arabie

Court Name: Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date Published: Feb 20, 1987

Citations: 502 So. 2d 565; 86-K-2284

Docket Number: 86-K-2284

Court Abbreviation: La.