History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Andrade-Torres
817 P.2d 296
Or. Ct. App.
1991
Check Treatment
817 P.2d 296 (1991)
109 Or.App. 153

STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
Florencio ANDRADE-TORRES, Appellant.

C900254CR; CA A65847.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted August 14, 1991.
Decided October 2, 1991.

David E. Groom, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Jas. Adams, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and DEITS, J.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was indicted for delivery of a controlled substance and possession of a controlled substance as "part of a drug cultivation, manufacture or delivery scheme or network." He demurred to the indictment. The demurrer was overruled. His motion to suppress evidence was denied, and he was convicted of both charges.

The court erred by overruling the demurrer. State v. Moeller, 105 Or. App. 434, 806 P.2d 130, rev. allowed 311 Or. 349, 811 P.2d 144, rev. dismissed 312 Or. 76, 815 P.2d 701 (1991). Because the demurrer should have been granted, the other claims of error are moot.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to dismiss indictment.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Andrade-Torres
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Oct 2, 1991
Citation: 817 P.2d 296
Docket Number: C900254CR CA A65847
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.