History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Amara
151 Conn. 744
Conn.
1964
Check Treatment

The defendant having filed a motion to set aside the judgment under attack and it appearing to this court that the state has failed to defend with proper diligence against the appeal of the defendant from the judgment of the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court in the ninth circuit finding the defendant guilty under both counts of the information, it is ordered that unless, on or before August 3, 1964, the state files its brief, judgment shall be entered directing that the judgments of the trial court and the Appellate Division be set aside and the case be remanded with direction to dismiss the information.

Arthur L. Spada, for the appellant (defendant). Harry W. Edelberg, prosecuting attorney, for the state. Argued June 2 decided June 3, 1964

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Amara
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Jun 3, 1964
Citation: 151 Conn. 744
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.