History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Allen
360 N.C. 569
N.C.
2006
Check Treatment

ORDER

WHEREAS the Supreme Court of North Carolina issued an opinion in State v. Allen, 359 N.C. 425 (2005), and whereas the Supreme Court of the United States issued an opinion in Washington v. Recuenco, - U.S. - , 126 S. Ct. 2977 (2006).

NOW THEREFORE, this Court, ex mero motu, withdraws the opinion filed on 1 July 2005 in State v. Allen, reported at 359 N.C. 425.

Upon consideration of the order of the Supreme Court of the United States vacating the judgment of this Court in North Carolina v. Speight, 126 S. Ct. 2977 (2006) and remanding that cause for further consideration in light of its decision in Washington v. Recuenco, -U.S.-, 126 S. Ct. 2977 (2006), the following order is entered:

The State shall have 20 days from the filing of this order to file and serve a supplemental brief with this Court, limited to the questions of whether there was error in this case pursuant to Washington v. Recuenco and, if so, whether any error can be found to be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Allen, 359 N.C. 425 (2005). Defendant may file his brief in response within 20 days after service of the State’s brief upon him. Each side will be allowed up to 20 minutes of oral argument.

By Order of the Court in Conference, this 17th day of August 2006.

Timmons-Goodson, J.

For the Court

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Allen
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Aug 17, 2006
Citation: 360 N.C. 569
Docket Number: No. 485PA04
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.