473 S.W.2d 746 | Mo. | 1971
Charged as a second offender, defendant was tried to a jury and found guilty of the crime of rape. The court assessed punishment at twenty years confinement.
On appeal, defendant submits one point. It is: “[T]he State failed to sustain its burden of proving defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt . . ..”
Testimony at the trial covered all of the details pertaining to the questioned offense, including the fears of the victim. In addition, medical evidence was given which confirmed that prosecutrix had been sexually abused. From all of which, the jury reasonably could have found all elements of the crime charged.
Defendant testified that he knew nothing of the events inside the garage; that during the time involved he had been visiting his wife; and, that he was going to his mother’s home to play cards when he saw prosecutrix in the alley. When it appeared that she needed help, he had gone to assist her; and, just at that time, the police arrived.
It was within the province of the jury to reject defendant’s testimony, and quite obviously the state’s evidence established a completed act of forcible rape. State v. Taylor, 320 Mo. 417, 8 S.W.2d 29; State v. Wilkins, Mo., 100 S.W.2d 889; and State v. Wynn, Mo., 357 S.W.2d 936.
As the evidence was sufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict, the judgment is affirmed.