History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Adler
278 S.C. 66
S.C.
1982
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

Each respondent was convicted by a magistrate’s jury of two counts of assault and battery. They moved before the magistrate for a new trial. He denied the motion, and they filed no notice of intent to appeal. Instead, they moved in General Sessions Court before a circuit judge for a new trial. He granted the motion. The State appeals.

*67A circuit court has only appellate jurisdiction over a j udgment from magistrate’s court. State v. Dickert, 260 S. C. 490, 197 S. E. (2d) 89 (1973). All appeals must be prosecuted as prescribed by statute. South Carolina Code of Laws § 18-3-20 (1976). Dewitt v. South Carolina Department of Highways, 274 S. C. 184, 262 S. E. (2d) 28 (1980). The circuit court judge heard this case not on appeal after proper filing of notice, but on a motion for a new trial. Therefore, he did not have jurisdiction over the matter.

Because the judge lacked jurisdiction to order a new trial, we reverse his order and reinstate the convictions and sentences.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Adler
Court Name: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Date Published: May 26, 1982
Citation: 278 S.C. 66
Docket Number: 21714
Court Abbreviation: S.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.