109 Iowa 61 | Iowa | 1899
The building entered was owned by the firm of Schaeffer & Reynolds. No question is made but that defendant broke and entered the store, and took goods therefrom; but it is claimed that he cannot properly be convicted of the offense charged, because the entry was made
One who has committed a criminal act is not entitled to(, be shielded from its consequences merely because lie was!
Clock, when on the witness stand, stated on cross-examination that he had owed defendant money. He was then asked whether defendant had been trying to collect it, and
We cannot leave this case without again, and in more emphatic terms, expressing our disapproval of the conduct of Clock, who> if he did not suggest, at least encouraged, the commission of the offense by defendant, We are inclined to